<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Robotica on Netsensei</title>
    <link>https://www.netsensei.be/tags/robotica/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Robotica on Netsensei</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>nl-NL</language>
    <managingEditor>matthias@netsensei.nl (Matthias Vandermaesen)</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>matthias@netsensei.nl (Matthias Vandermaesen)</webMaster>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 21:51:59 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.netsensei.be/tags/robotica/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Mars vs Web 2.0</title>
      <link>https://www.netsensei.be/2007/07/16/mars-vs-flickr/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 21:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>matthias@netsensei.nl (Matthias Vandermaesen)</author>
      <guid>https://www.netsensei.be/2007/07/16/mars-vs-flickr/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;http://kristof.willen.be/node/784&#34;&gt;Kristof&lt;/a&gt;, looking at your post, i couldn’t resist but thinking: the
&lt;a href=&#34;http://marsrovers.nasa.gov/home/&#34;&gt;Mars Exploration Rover Mission&lt;/a&gt; should’ve been using the web! From a
scientific point of view, the mission was a success. But what about the media?
Did the story of those two brave robots really break anything? Well, it did at
the start, but now, more then three years into the mission and a with fair
amount of miles on record, how much media exposure do they get now? Well, not
quite so much. Though &lt;a href=&#34;http://marswatch.astro.cornell.edu/pancam_instrument/images.html&#34;&gt;the photos&lt;/a&gt; are still quite spectacular, the next time
we here from those robots in mainstream media, is when they finally die.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But what if the web acted as a platform? What if the JPL and NASA bobo’s
start using all those Web 2.0 toys to enhance exposure? How about &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.flickr.com&#34;&gt;Flickr&lt;/a&gt; to
distribute all those &lt;a href=&#34;http://marswatch.astro.cornell.edu/pancam_instrument/sunset489_new2.html&#34;&gt;wonderfull&lt;/a&gt; media? It would be infinitely cool to get
those pictures pushed through syndication! How about a video-dairy on
&lt;a href=&#34;http://www.youtube.com&#34;&gt;YouTube&lt;/a&gt;? Okay, rocketpeople don’t really have time to make those, but
still… And what about &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.twitter.com&#34;&gt;Twitter&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.pownce.com&#34;&gt;Pownce&lt;/a&gt;? Those robots were
designed and built long before those even were thought of as a concept, but how
hard can it be to translate the highlights from the transmissionlogs into
simple, understandable things such as ‘exploring this rock’,
‘taking another picture of a panorama’, ‘doing some
self-diagnosis’ or ‘uh-oh! Sandstorm heading this way! Better
conserve battery-power!’&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think it would make the results of such projects better accessible, more
tangible and therefore improve our grasp over other worlds. It would demonstrate
that ‘rocketscience’ should not be some expensive leisure
that’s only meant to be enjoyed by a select few. Finally, exposure means
comprehension about why we are still doing this! And – of course –
it means hard cash! Something NASA can use to fund new exciting projects.&lt;br&gt;
Then again, I would already be happy if they’d done away with the
butt-ugly HTML/JS spaghetti that’s supposed to be &lt;a href=&#34;http://marsrovers.nasa.gov/home/&#34;&gt;their main website&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>