<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Profaanwoord on Netsensei</title>
    <link>https://www.netsensei.be/tags/profaanwoord/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Profaanwoord on Netsensei</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>nl-NL</language>
    <managingEditor>matthias@netsensei.nl (Matthias Vandermaesen)</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>matthias@netsensei.nl (Matthias Vandermaesen)</webMaster>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 23:06:59 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.netsensei.be/tags/profaanwoord/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Mollom 0.6.2, the Urgent One</title>
      <link>https://www.netsensei.be/2008/11/11/mollom-062-the-urgent-one/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 23:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>matthias@netsensei.nl (Matthias Vandermaesen)</author>
      <guid>https://www.netsensei.be/2008/11/11/mollom-062-the-urgent-one/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Since a couple of weeks people using &lt;a href=&#34;http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wp-mollom/&#34;&gt;WP Mollom&lt;/a&gt; got hit by some spam. On
friday, &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.druivensuiker.be&#34;&gt;Bert&lt;/a&gt; took the problem to &lt;a href=&#34;http://twitter.com/Dextro/status/994780103&#34;&gt;Twitter&lt;/a&gt;, which caught my attention.
Of course, we want to get rid of all the spam and so I notified Dries.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Over the weekend, &lt;a href=&#34;http://buytaert.net&#34;&gt;Dries&lt;/a&gt; did some research in the logfiles and noticed some
disturbing patterns concerning feedback sent from WordPress blogs using the
plugin. Most moderated messages got reported as ‘profanity’ rather
then ‘spam’. That led, with the much appreciated help of
&lt;a href=&#34;http://pascal.vanhecke.info/&#34;&gt;Pascal&lt;/a&gt;, to the discovery of a nasty bug in the feedback functions of the
plugin.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It seems that spam was reported as ‘profanity’ and
‘unwanted’ as ‘spam’. The feedback qualifiers got
totally messed up in a conditional block… and accustomed with the code as
I got, I probably read over it a thousand times without really noticing the
error. Through sending the wrong qualifiers, the Mollom servers can not
interpret correctly what is spam or not for your blog. This has, of couse, a
serious impact on the performance of &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.mollom.com&#34;&gt;Mollom&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Given the nature and the severity of the error, I corrected it and put version
0.6.2 with *only* this bugfix up for release on &lt;a href=&#34;http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wp-mollom/&#34;&gt;WordPress Extend&lt;/a&gt;. So, if
you’re running version 0.6.1 or lower, you should download the
&lt;a href=&#34;http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wp-mollom/&#34;&gt;fixed version&lt;/a&gt; as soon as possible.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>