<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Bug on Netsensei</title>
    <link>https://www.netsensei.be/tags/bug/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Bug on Netsensei</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>nl-NL</language>
    <managingEditor>matthias@netsensei.nl (Matthias Vandermaesen)</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>matthias@netsensei.nl (Matthias Vandermaesen)</webMaster>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 23:06:59 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.netsensei.be/tags/bug/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Mollom 0.6.2, the Urgent One</title>
      <link>https://www.netsensei.be/2008/11/11/mollom-062-the-urgent-one/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 23:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>matthias@netsensei.nl (Matthias Vandermaesen)</author>
      <guid>https://www.netsensei.be/2008/11/11/mollom-062-the-urgent-one/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Since a couple of weeks people using &lt;a href=&#34;http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wp-mollom/&#34;&gt;WP Mollom&lt;/a&gt; got hit by some spam. On
friday, &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.druivensuiker.be&#34;&gt;Bert&lt;/a&gt; took the problem to &lt;a href=&#34;http://twitter.com/Dextro/status/994780103&#34;&gt;Twitter&lt;/a&gt;, which caught my attention.
Of course, we want to get rid of all the spam and so I notified Dries.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Over the weekend, &lt;a href=&#34;http://buytaert.net&#34;&gt;Dries&lt;/a&gt; did some research in the logfiles and noticed some
disturbing patterns concerning feedback sent from WordPress blogs using the
plugin. Most moderated messages got reported as ‘profanity’ rather
then ‘spam’. That led, with the much appreciated help of
&lt;a href=&#34;http://pascal.vanhecke.info/&#34;&gt;Pascal&lt;/a&gt;, to the discovery of a nasty bug in the feedback functions of the
plugin.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It seems that spam was reported as ‘profanity’ and
‘unwanted’ as ‘spam’. The feedback qualifiers got
totally messed up in a conditional block… and accustomed with the code as
I got, I probably read over it a thousand times without really noticing the
error. Through sending the wrong qualifiers, the Mollom servers can not
interpret correctly what is spam or not for your blog. This has, of couse, a
serious impact on the performance of &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.mollom.com&#34;&gt;Mollom&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Given the nature and the severity of the error, I corrected it and put version
0.6.2 with *only* this bugfix up for release on &lt;a href=&#34;http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wp-mollom/&#34;&gt;WordPress Extend&lt;/a&gt;. So, if
you’re running version 0.6.1 or lower, you should download the
&lt;a href=&#34;http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wp-mollom/&#34;&gt;fixed version&lt;/a&gt; as soon as possible.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>WP Mollom 0.5.2</title>
      <link>https://www.netsensei.be/2008/07/20/wp-mollom-052/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 18:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>matthias@netsensei.nl (Matthias Vandermaesen)</author>
      <guid>https://www.netsensei.be/2008/07/20/wp-mollom-052/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;So, I wrapped up version 0.5.2 of &lt;a href=&#34;http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wp-mollom&#34;&gt;WP Mollom&lt;/a&gt; today. This release is all
about fixing several bugs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;fixed: passing $comment instead of the direct input from $_POST to the
&lt;code&gt;show_captcha()&lt;/code&gt; and &lt;code&gt;check_captcha()&lt;/code&gt; functions.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;improved: implemented wpdb-&amp;gt;prepare() in vunerable queries&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;improved: &lt;code&gt;mollom_activate()&lt;/code&gt; function now more robust&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;changed: mollom_author_ip() reflects changes in the API documentation. This
is to catch up on the abuse of proxies by spammers. If your host uses a
&lt;a href=&#34;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reverse_proxy&#34;&gt;reverse proxy&lt;/a&gt; and you know the ip(‘s), just enter them in the
dashboard. The plugin takes care of the rest.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I tried to make the plugin compatible with the &lt;a href=&#34;http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/openid/&#34;&gt;WP OpenID plugin&lt;/a&gt; over the
past weeks. But no dice. Stable version 2.1.9 of WP OpenID doesn’t deal
with extra fields added to the HTTP POST by other plugins when a request is send
to wp-comments-post.php. This causes WP Mollom’s CAPTCHA form and
subsequent checks to malfunction.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The good news is that &lt;a href=&#34;http://willnorris.com/&#34;&gt;Will Norris&lt;/a&gt; of WP OpenID is aware of the problem. The
development version does contain a fix for this problem and is actually
compatible with WP Mollom. You can check out a copy from the
&lt;a href=&#34;http://diso-project.org/&#34;&gt;DiSo Project’s&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&#34;http://diso.googlecode.com/svn/wordpress/wp-openid/&#34;&gt;Google Code repository&lt;/a&gt; if you really want OpenID
and Mollom support on your site.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As always: refer to &lt;a href=&#34;http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wp-mollom/other_notes/&#34;&gt;the documentation&lt;/a&gt; regarding all the in’s and
out’s.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Dapper?</title>
      <link>https://www.netsensei.be/2006/07/17/dapper/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 21:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>matthias@netsensei.nl (Matthias Vandermaesen)</author>
      <guid>https://www.netsensei.be/2006/07/17/dapper/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Hmpf, ubuntu op mijn desktop hier thuis geïnstalleerd. Vijf minuten duurde het
vooraleer &lt;a href=&#34;https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-driver-ati/+bug/38181&#34;&gt;bug #38181&lt;/a&gt; het zaakje terug naar af stuurde. Totale lock-up en
verplichte reboot.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Blijkbaar is het probleem al twee maanden gekend, dus nog voor de release van
Dapper. Wat ik wel jammer vind. Er zullen altijd wel fouten zijn, maar dit vind
ik wel een vrij grote. Als je als nieuwbakken gebruiker Ubuntu van voor het
eerst uitprobeert, dan laat zo’n bug géén goede indruk na. Nu ja, dan maar
een zwart scherm als screensaver genomen…&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Wispelturige Vuurvos</title>
      <link>https://www.netsensei.be/2006/03/23/wispelturige-vuurvos/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 23:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>matthias@netsensei.nl (Matthias Vandermaesen)</author>
      <guid>https://www.netsensei.be/2006/03/23/wispelturige-vuurvos/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Firefox heeft zo zijn goede kanten. Maar er is ook een duistere zijde. Getuige
daarvan &lt;a href=&#34;https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=330884&#34; title=&#34;&#34;&gt;volgende bug&lt;/a&gt; die onlangs werd gemeld. Even naar beneden scrollen en
de eerste commentaar lezen…&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This privacy flaw has caused my fiancé and I to break-up after having dated
for 5 years. Basically, we share one computer but under separate Windows XP
user accounts. We both use Mozilla Firefox — well, he used to use it
more than I do but now we don’t really use it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Pijnlijk… Eens zien hoe snel ze dit gaan oplossen!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>